Paul asks the question if it is allowable and/or appropriate to allow for dissent during a global crises. Is interpreting the data (without spreading fake news which could cause harm to health) something that should even be allowed during a time when data is changing almost daily? What happens to content that was banned at one point and then proven to be right later? Who should be the controller of what is and isn't allowed in public discourse? And is it better if fake news is left on the same platforms as the truth for light to be used as a disinfectant?
Sign up to get updates from us